|
September 2002, Volume 8 No. 2
ARTICLE 1
Effects of Feeding Fat During Pregnancy and Lactation
on Growth Performance, Milk Composition and Very Low Density
Lipoprotein Composition in Ratstc "Density Lipoprotein Composition
in Rats"
Loh
Teck Chwen1, Foo Hooi Ling2, Zurina Abdul
Wahab1 & Tan Bee Koon1
1
Department of Animal Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM
Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Email: tcloh@agric.upm.edu.my
2
Department of Biotechnology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM
Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The effects of dietary fat during pregnancy and lactation on
growth performance of pups, milk composition and very low density
lipoprotein composition in rats were studied. A total of 33 dams
were used in this study and each litter was adjusted to 8 pups per
dam. The dams were fed on high fat (150 g fat/kg diet, HF), medium
fat (75 g fat/kg of diet, MF) and low fat (2.5 g fat/kg diet, LF)
diets. The body weights of dams increased during pregnancy and
decreased after pregnancy. The HF pups had a higher body weight and
higher weight gain than those of LF pups. The amount of feed intake
of HF dams was significantly higher than LF and MF dams. The HF dams
had significantly higher milk fat and water concentrations than LF
dams. The milk protein was not significantly different among the
treatment groups. All dams showed hypertriacylglycerolaemia in their
very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) in late pregnancy. The VLDL-protein
concentrations increased during the first week after parturition.
The HF dams showed a greater response to the dietary fat than that
of LF and MF dams. The findings suggest that addition of fat in the
diet during pregnancy and lactation may improve the milk quality
through modifying the composition of VLDL contents, leading to
better growth of pups.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|