|
March/September 2001, Volume 7 No. 1&2
ARTICLE 7
Invited Review
Bioelectrical
impedance: From
theories to
applications
Mabel Deurenberg –Yap1 and Paul Deurenberg2
1 Director, Research and Information Management. Health
Promotion Board, 3 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168937 and
Adjunct Senior Fellow, National University of Singapore. Email:
Mabel-Yap@hpb.gov.sg
2 Nutrition Consultant, Singapore
Abstract
Total body bioelectrical impedance is a measure for total
body water. From total body water the fat free mass and, by
difference with body weight, the fat mass (body fat percent) can be
calculated. Prediction formulas for body fat percent based on
impedance assume a constant hydration of the fat free mass, an
assumption that might be violated in individuals, thus resulting in
biased individual predictions. The electrical properties of the
human body depend on water distribution between extra- and
intra-cellular space and also on geometrical water distribution. In
addition, body build factors also influence total or segmental
impedance values. As body build and water distribution can differ
between populations, impedance formulas aiming to quantify water
compartments or body fat percent should also be population
specific. In addition other factors like body position, skin and/or
body temperature and osmotic values of the body fluids have an
impact on the measured impedance values. This, together with likely
disturbances in body water distribution in patients, makes the
quantitative use of impedance in clinical practice difficult and
prone to misinterpretations.
For the prediction of body fat percent in populations, the method
can be suitable. But, as there are differences in body build between
(ethnic) population groups, for example in relative leg length and
in slenderness, it is likely that that prediction formulas have
different bias across ethnic groups. This means that for meaningful
comparisons between population groups, formulas have to be validated
in these groups.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|