|
March/September 2001, Volume 7 No. 1&2
ARTICLE 2
Assessment of Food
Insecurity Among Low Income Households in Kuala Lumpur Using the
Radimer/Cornell Food Insecurity Instrument – A Validation Study
Zalilah Mohd. Sharif and Ang Merlin
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and
Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang,
Selangor, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
Food insecurity exists whenever people are not able to access
sufficient food at all times for an active and healthy life. This
study used the Radimer/Cornell hunger and food insecurity instrument
to assess food insecurity and to determine the risk factors and
consequences of food insecurity among low-income households in Kuala
Lumpur. One hundred and thirty-seven Malay pre-school children (4-6
years old) from Taman Sang Kancil were measured for their weights
and heights. Questionnaires were used to collect food security and
socioeconomic information on the households. The findings indicated
that 34.3% of the households were food secure, while 65.7%
experienced some kind of food insecurity, (27.7% households were
food insecure, 10.9% individuals were food insecure and 27.0% fell
into the child hunger category). The prevalence of underweight,
stunting and wasting were 44.5%, 36.5% and 30.7% respectively. The
prevalence of high weight-for-height (overweight) was 13.1%. Based
on multinomial logistic regression, larger household size (OR=1.418;
p<0.01) and lower educational level of mothers (OR=0.749; p<0.01)
and fathers (OR=0.802; p<0.05) were found to be significant risk
factors for food insecurity. The study, however, did not find any
significant difference in children’s nutritional status according to
household food security levels. It is recommended that for the
Malaysian population, the Radimer/Cornell hunger and food insecurity
instrument should be modified and further validated with various
ethnic groups in a variety of settings. The validation should
include the appropriateness of the statements to the target grounds
and their different risk factors and outcomes of food insecurity.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|