|
March 2000, Volume 6 No. 1
ARTICLE 1
Evaluation
of the School Supplementary Feeding Program in Peninsular Malaysia
Mohd Shahril Md. Arop1, Aminah Abdullah2, Suriah Abdul Rahman and Mohd Fauzi
Mohd Jani3
1 Department of
Nutrition and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti
Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor.
2 Program of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor.
3
Department of Agricultural Economics and Natural Resources, Faculty of Economics,
University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor
ABSTRACT
This
study was conducted to evaluate the implementation of the School Supplement
Feeding Program (SSFP) among primary school in terms of financial management
and budget disbursement, food preparation, selection of menus and nutrient content
of food served. A total of 129 schools comprising 77 national type, 31 Chinese
and 21 Tamil vernacular schools in four different regions (northern, eastern,
central and southern) of Peninsular Malaysia were selected for this study. The
results of this cross-sectional study showed a need to improve the budget disbursement
to schools. Most of the schools followed the guidelines provided by the Ministry
of Education for selection of eligible children. The quality of food prepared
by contracted (local community members) and voluntary (teachers) operators.
The use of 10 recommended menus provided for a 2-week cycle by most of the schools
has shown increased acceptance and less monotonous feeling towards the food
among the children. Nutrient content of food served increased relatively with
an increase in budget from RM0.45 to RM0.80 per child. Parents surveyed indicated
that the program should continue as this will keep children from low income
families from being hungry during school hours. A continued process of monitoring
and evaluation is necessary to improve its implementation.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|