|
REVIEWS II
December 1998, Volume 4 No. 1&2
Mal J Nutr 4:107-112, 1998.
http://nutriweb.org.my/publications/mjn004/mjn4n12_008.pdf
Bioelectrical
impedance and body composition assessment.
Andrew P. Hills and
Nuala M. Byrne
School of Human Movement
Studies, Queensland University Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
ABSTRACT
(Full Article)
Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) has become increasingly popular in recent years in the
assessment of body composition and body fluid status. The level of interest
in this technique is related to the following advantages: it is non-invasive,
inexpensive, portable and requires minimal subject compliance. However,
as with all indirect methods, the ability of BIA to accurately assess
body composition is dependent upon a number of technical and biological
assumptions. Most BIA research to date has utilised instrumentation
capable of measurement at a single frequency, commonly 50kHz. More recently,
significant improvements in the prediction of body water characteristics
have been cited when multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analyses
(MFBIA) are employed. MFBIA may provide a more effective means of monitoring
hydration levels in studies of nutrition and physical activity. This
paper provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the BIA
method with specific reference to assessment protocols for experimental
and clinical situations. A number of studies undertaken in the authors'
laboratory have considered the influence of tester, machine, time and
postural differences on the reliability of impedance measures. Results
from one of these studies are discussed.
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|