|
September 1996, Volume 2 No. 2
ARTICLE 6
Energy requirements of
Malaysian soldiers in a base camp
Ismail MN1, Isa M2 and Janudin A3
1
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Allied Health
Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300 Kuala Lumpur.
2 Palm Oil
Research Institute Malaysia, No. 6 Persiaran Institusi, Bandar Baru
Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor.
3 Defence
Science and Technology Centre, Ministry of Defence, Kuala Lumpur.
ABSTRACT
The
energy intake and expenditure of 20 healthy soldiers (mean age, 25
years, weight 61 kg and height 1.67 m) was assessed. Trained
personnel stayed in the camp throughout the 5 weeks study period.
Each soldier was subjected to a 7-day comprehensive protocol
involving anthropometric, food intake, activity pattern and energy
expenditure measurements. The mean change in body weight and fat
content was minimal, -0.2kg and -0.25%, respectively. Body fat and
BMI ranges from 10.0-21.6% and 19.8-24.9, respectively. The mean
energy intake of 2190 ± 197 kcal was well below (81%) the
recommended allowance of 2700 kcal for the Malaysian Armed Forces.
The ration scale analysed chemically provides 2900 kcal thus
suggesting a 24% wastage of daily ration. Contribution of protein
(15%), fat (25%) and carbohydrate (60%) to energy intake appears to
be in line to healthy dietary guidelines. Energy cost of
standardised activities were found to be lower in Malaysian soldiers
as compared to British soldiers studied under similar environment in
the tropics. The mean total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) for
soldiers were 2886 ± 222 kcal with a negative energy balance of
about 700 kcal. The results suggested that there is a need to review
the current provision with regard to food supply and preparation in
army camps, to ensure that the menu provided are appealing as well
as nutritious for the soldiers.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|