|
September 1996, Volume 2 No. 2
ARTICLE 2
Body mass index and fat
patterning of adults in rural Sarawak
Ulijaszek SJ1
and Strickland SS2
1
Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge,
Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England
2 Human Nutrition Unit, London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1H OBT, England
ABSTRACT
Body fatness distribution
is a useful epidemiological and clinical marker of health risk among
European and other populations. Prevalence of obesity among adults
is rising in many parts of Malaysia, and it is important to
understand the extent to which fat patterning is robust across
different age groups and between the sexes. This analysis examines
fatness and fat distribution in rural Sarawakian adults aged 20 to
80 years to determine the extent to which fat patterning varies by
sex and age. Principal component analysis of five skinfolds (biceps,
triceps, subscapular, suprailiac and medial calf) shows upper
body-lower body fat distribution as contributing most to
within-group variation in the sum of five skinfolds for both males
and females. When divided into younger and older age groups, clear
differences were identified. For the males, while absolute fatness
does not change with age, there is a change in fat patterning, with
a trunk-extremity component disappearing, and a trunk-lower body
pattern persisting. Females experience a decline in subcutaneous
fatness across age groups, and while the most important component of
fat distribution, trunk to lower body subcutaneous fatness, the same
for younger and older women, the second component is different, with
upper limb-lower body distribution in the younger age group being
replaced with upper to lower trunk distribution. The similarities in
fat patterning among males and females suggest that the use of fat
patterning indices in this Malaysian population need not be
sex-specific, but age group- and sex-dependent differences in the
second principal component indicate that they should be used with
caution, since the relationships between fat patterning and
mortality are still poorly understood among Malaysian populations.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|