|
March 1996, Volume 2 No. 1
ARTICLE 8
Hurdles and hopes in the
management of human obesity
AG Dulloo
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Geneva, 1, Rue Michel Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
ABSTRACT
A population shift towards obesity is a major side-effect of
changes in lifestyle that accompany economic prosperity, and a high
risk factor for many chronic degenerative diseases including
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), coronary heart
disease and hypertension. According to current WHO population
statistics, 40% of obese patients eventually develop NIDDM, 80% of
individuals with NIDDM are obese and the incidence of hypertension
in obesity and NIDDM could be as high as 50%. Of particular concern
for developing countries is the strong epidemiological evidence
indicating that the prevalence of obesity and diabetes often
increase in epidemic proportions in communities emerging from
lifestyles of subsistence into affluence. Even modest increase
in prosperity seem to be associated with the most marked increases
in the proportion of these chronic diseases. Indeed, obesity and its
pathophysiological complications have become health priorities among
American Indians, Australian Aborigines, Pacific Islanders, and are
rapidly becoming major concerns among many other developing
countries. For example, the prevalence of obesity (BMI >30) for the
middle-age group is 32% in women living in Urban Trinidad, 16.4% in
Nicaragua, 14% in Costa Rica, values which are higher than for the
USA (12-15%) or in the UK (8-9%). Even more spectacular are the
health statistics about the middle-aged Pima Indians in Arizona and
inhabitants of the South Pacific Island of Nauru, showing that more
than 80% are obese, and 50-70% have NIDDM. These grim figures must
be weighed against the hard fact that there is at present no
effective cure for obesity, and judging from the outcome of health
policies in countries with a long experience in dealing with this
problem, the management of obesity has a long and disappointing
history. In fact, for the past decades, a wide array of treatment
has been available to their public (low-calorie regimes, low-fat or
high fibre foods, anorectic drugs, exercise and behavioural therapy,
etc), but in the vast majority of cases, the result is a transient
phase of weight loss, followed by a return to the obese condition
within a few years. Despite the poor prognosis of treating obesity
by reducing food intake (by dieting alone or with the help of
anorectic drugs), thi approach will continue to be the most common
form of treatment in the foreseeable future. However, there is
growing realisation that in response to reduced food intake, the
accompanying fall in energy expenditure is a major factor that
limits weight loss and contributes to obesity relapse. After an
analysis of the various approaches to reduce energy intake, this
paper will examine the extent to which re-adjustments in the various
compartments of energy expenditure contribute to this apparent
adaptation to reduced food intake. It will then analyze the
rationale, applicability and effectiveness of various approaches (behavioural,
dietary, and pharmacological) that could conceivably stimulate the
metabolic rate and thus counteract such adaptive changes in energy
expenditure in order to improve the efficacy of obesity management.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|