|
September 1995, Volume 1 No. 2
ARTICLE 1
Evaluation of food
photographs for 24-hour recall method
Zamaliah Mohd Marjan
Department of Nutrition and Community Health, Faculty of Human
Ecology, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. 43400 Serdang, Selangor
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study
was to develop a visual aid to improve and increase accuracy of the
24-hour recall method. This aid in the form of a booklet, consists
of life-sized photographs of common Malaysian foods, accompanied by
the weight of its edible portion and nutrient values. These
photographs used together with the recall method were tested against
the weighed record method for its validity. For this preliminary
test, a total of 23 photographs of food items were tested. Sixty
healthy adult volunteers were selected as respondents for the test.
These respondents were divided into 2 groups. Each group was given
either a simple or complicated menus. The respondents were served 3
test meals: breakfast, lunch and tea. Each food item served and
plate waste were weighed and recorded. The 24-hour recall was
conducted the day following the weighed record day. The results of
the paired t-tests indicated no significant difference in group’s
mean weights of food intake between the weighed record and recalled
method for 13(57%) of the foods tested. The correlation coefficients
between the two methods showed a moderate to strong positive
relationships for 17 out of the 23 food photographs tested (ranged
from r=0.49-0.92, p<0.01). Analysis on the nutrient intake for
simple menus showed high correlation coefficients between both
methods for all nutrients tested, r=0.62-0.95, p<0.01. For the
complicated menus, the correlation coefficients were slightly lower
than the simple menus, ranging from r=0.38-0.71, P<0.0l. Except for
the fat intake in the complicated menus, all the correlation
coefficients between the two methods reached 0.5 and above for both
types of menus.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|