|
Mal J Nutr 17(1): 43-53, 2011
Assessing the Resting Energy Expenditure of Cancer Patients in the Penang General Hospital
Khor SM1 & Mohd Baidi B2*
1 Penang General Hospital, 10990 Pulau Pinang
2 School of Pharmacy, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Pulau Pinang
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Malnutrition is common in cancer patients. Generally, it is believed
that the resting energy expenditure (REE) is elevated in cancer patients and this
contributes to the development of malnutrition. Thus, to be able to assess theREE is important in planning adequate nutrition support. Methods: A crosssectional
study was carried out to assess the REE in patients with solid tumour (n=25), leukemia (n=25) and healthy subjects (n=50) by using the indirect
calorimetry method under standard conditions. Results: There was no significant difference between the measured REE among patients with solid
tumour, leukemia and the control group (p=0.534). By contrast, there was a significant
difference between the REE/kg FFM in solid tumour patients compared to the leukemia group and the healthy subjects, (p=0.049 and p=0.002). The REE derived
from the Harris Benedict Equation was found to be significantly higher than the measured
REE. The stress factor for patients with solid tumour was 1.35 and that for leukemia patients was 1.36. Conclusion: The REE/ kg FFM in the cancer
patients undergoing anticancer therapy appeared to be higher than expected compared to healthy subjects. The Harris Benedict Equation (HBE) was found to
over-estimate the REE of cancer patients in the study. As the total energy expenditure (TEE) is estimated by multiplying the REE with the stress factor and
physical activity factor, the overestimated REE from HBE will further increase the risk of overfeeding in this population.
Keywords: Cancer patients, resting energy expenditure
Download full article
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|