|
2009, Volume 15 No. 2
ARTICLE 5
Breakfast Skipping and Its Associated Factors among Undergraduates in a Public University in Kuala Lumpur
Moy FM1, Johari S2, Ismail Y3, Mahad R4, Tie FH5
& Wan Ismail WMA4
1 Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
2 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
3 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya
4 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya
5 Department of Principality Study, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya
ABSTRACT
An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in a public university in Kuala
Lumpur among a random sample of 2665 undergraduates. The objective was to
study the prevalence of breakfast skipping and its associated factors. Data
collection was conducted via a self-administered pre-tested questionnaire. There
were 43.5% male respondents, with Malays being the majority (58.3%). The
prevalence of breakfast skipping was 29.2 (95% CI: 27.3 - 30.3) %. The factors
significantly associated with breakfast skipping (p<0.05) were age, race,
accommodation, faculty and skipping dinner. As the respondents’ age increased,
their risk of breakfast skipping was lower (OR: 0.95; 0.89 - 0.99). Malays (OR:
1.94; 1.48 - 2.54), Indians (OR: 1.70; 1.08 - 2.66), and students from the Sabah and
Sarawak indigenous communities (OR: 2.13; 1.37 - 3.33) were more likely to skip
breakfast compared to their Chinese counterparts. Respondents who stayed in
their own houses were also less likely to skip breakfast compared to those
staying in hostel with meals catered (OR: 2.32; 1.39 - 3.84), hostel with cafeteria
(OR: 2.92; 1.74 - 4.91) or in rented houses (OR: 2.08; 1.25 - 3.46). Respondents
majoring in Arts & Economics had 1.40 (1.07 - 1.82) times risk of breakfast
skipping compared to those majoring in Life Sciences. Those who skipped dinner
too had twice the odds (1.47 - 2.77) of breakfast skipping. In conclusion the
prevalence of breakfast skipping among the undergraduates of this university
was moderately high. Health awareness campaigns or introduction of healthy
eating guidelines should be initiated for the undergraduates as well as food
caterers in campus. The policy and pricing of catered food in campus should also
be reviewed.
Full Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|