2009, Volume 15 No. 2

ARTICLE 12

Proximate Composition and Functional Properties of Mushroom Flours from Ganoderma spp., Omphalotus olearius (DC.) Sing. and Hebeloma mesophaeum (Pers.) Quél. Used in Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Aremu MO1, Basu SK2, Gyar SD3, Goyal A4, Bhowmik PK5 & Datta Banik S6*
1 Department of Chemistry, Nasarawa State University, PMB 1022 Keffi, Nigeria
2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive Lethbridge, AB Canada
3 Department of Biological Sciences Nasarawa State University, PMB 1022 Keffi, Nigeria
4 Sustainable Production System, Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB Canada
5 Bioproducts and Bioprocesses, Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB Canada
6 Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India

ABSTRACT
The proximate composition and functional properties of three edible mushroom (Ganoderma spp., Omphalotus olearius (DC.) Sing. and Hebeloma mesophaeum (Pers.) Quél.) flours used in Nasarawa state, Nigaria were investigated using standard analytical techniques. The samples contained crude protein in the range of 18.5% in Omphalotus olearius to 21.5% in Ganoderma spp. Crude fat varied with values ranging from 6.9% in Ganoderma spp. to 8.7% in Omphalotus olearius. Other proximate composition values were in the following ranges: moisture content 10.0 - 11.1%, ash 7.3 - 8.3%, crude fibre 2.8 - 3.5% and carbohydrate (by difference) 50.3 - 50.9%. The range values of functional properties were: foaming capacity 101.8 - 131.5%, foaming stability 51.0 - 54.0%, water absorption capacity 260.0 – 390.0%, oil absorption capacity 450 - 480%, oil emulsion capacity 57.3 - 61.0mLg- 1, least gelation concentration 12.0 - 14.0% and bulk density 230.0 - 410.0gmL-1. The results showed that these nutrient rich mushroom flours under investigation may prove useful in the formulation of different food products where foaming, emulsification, retention of flavour and palatability as well as gel formation are required.


Full Article >>

March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)

2010, Vol 16(2)

2010, Vol 16(3)

2011, Vol 17(1)

2011, Vol 17(2)

2011, Vol 17(3)