|
2007, Volume 13 No. 2
ARTICLE 7
Protein Quality of Anchovy, Mackerel and Canned Sardine Samples
Babji AS, AidillaM, Gugapreya C, Lai CJ, Nur Bazlina B, Cahyana C, Nor Hayati CP & Suriati Z
School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, FST, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The protein nutritive value of anchovy, mackerel and canned sardine samples
together with casein as a reference formulation were evaluated. Proximate
composition, protein quality and protein digestibility were determined.
Procedures for evaluation included Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) using the rat
bioassay and in vivo Apparent Digestibility (AD). Rats fed with canned sardine
diet had the highest mean body weight (154.8±12.28g) while rats fed with
anchovy diet had the lowest mean body weight (145.27±15.89g) with significant
differences between all the groups. Mean body weight of rats fed with
selected fish diet was higher compared to rats fed with casein diet. For PER
value, canned sardine has the highest value (2.48), followed by anchovy (2.46)
and mackerel (2.34). PER value for all selected fish is lower than that for casein
(3.14). Mackerel had the highest value of in vivo AD (96.99%), followed by
casein (96.96%), canned sardine (96.88%) and anchovy (91.29%). In conclusion,
among the types of fish compared, sardine had the highest protein quality
while mackerel showed the highest digestibility.
Full Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|