|
2006, Volume 12 No. 2
ARTICLE 6
Effect of Processed Beverages on Dialysable Iron From Rice
Based Meals in Comparison with Fresh Fruits
Jyothi Lakshmi A, Sheetal Gupta & Jamuna Prakash
Department of Studies in Food Science & Nutrition, University of Mysore,
Manasagangothri, Mysore - 570 006.
ABSTRACT
The investigation is aimed at analysing the effect of fruits and processed
beverages on the dialysable iron content of a rice based meal with four different
green leafy vegetables (GLV). Rice (150g), red gram (30g) and a GLV (150g)
forming the meal components were pressure-cooked and homogenised. To
each of the meal, one of the following was added at 400 g or ml/meal level -
fresh fruit pulp or juice (four varieties), reconstituted juice powders (RJP), fruit
squashes, ready to drink fruit beverage (RTD) and carbonated beverages (CB).
Two brands of each processed beverages were used. Dialysable iron content of
diets increased by 16-104% on addition of fruit pulp and by 45-263% on addition
of fruit juices over the respective control diets. Among the processed
juices, RJP enhanced the dialysable iron by 30-81%, fruit squashes by 20-138%,
RTD by 33-96% and carbonated beverages by 1-131% with different brands.
Differences observed in the two brands of processed beverages could be
attributed to their ascorbic acid and citric acid contents. Hence, it can be
concluded that addition of fruit/fruit juice, either in natural or synthetic forms
containing organic acids i.e., citric, ascorbic or maleic acids will definitely
increase the iron dialysability of cereal meal indicating enhanced iron
bioavailability.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|