|
2006, Volume 12 No. 1
ARTICLE 8
Symphysis-Fundal Height and Abdominal Circumference
Measurements as Indicators for Low Birth Weight
Fatemeh Shobeiri1 & Mansour Nazari2
1Maternal and Child Health, Department of Obstetrics, School of Nursing & Obstetrics,
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan - Iran
2School of Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan - Iran
ABSTRACT
The study was conducted to determine if symphysis-fundal height and
abdominal circumference measurements at the umbilical level could be used
as indicators of risk for low birth weight infants. Thereby simple equations
could be derived to predict birth weights. Five hundred pregnant women in
their first trimester, belonging to the middle and upper socioeconomic families
from Mysore City, India, participated in the study. They were monitored till
one-week post delivery period. The mean symphysis-fundal height at the end
of second and third trimesters was 25.2 ± 1.9 and 32.5 ± 2.5 cm, respectively.
Significant associations between birth weight and symphysis-fundal height
(r=0.219, P<0.01) or abdominal circumference (r=0.438, P<0.01) or weight gain
was noticed at the end of the second trimester, suggesting these to be valuable
indicators. A symphysis-fundal measurement of less than 25 cm or abdominal
circumference of less than 95 cm in the second trimester is significantly associated
with low birth weight infants. Maternal weight gain of less than 3 kg at 28±2 week of pregnancy had a higher association with low birth weight. These
should be used as monitoring parameters for risk pregnancies. These parameters
can be applied in the prediction of low birth weight babies and allow
appropriate interventions to be undertaken during the antenatal period.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|