2006, Volume 12 No. 1

ARTICLE 3

Assessment of Nutritional Status through Body Mass Index among Adult Males of 7 Tribal Populations of Maharashtra, India

Dipak K Adak, Rajesh K Gautam & Ajay K Gharami 
Anthropological Survey of India, c/o Department of Anthropology, Dr. H.S. Gour University, Saugor-470003, Madhya Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT
This paper deals with the assessment of nutritional status through body mass index (BMI) in adult males of 7 tribal populations of the Maharashtra state of India. Anthropometric data collected by the Anthropological Survey of India on 600 adult males aged 18-60 years were used in this analysis. Majority of them were thin and lean with medium to short stature. The mean BMI was found to be highest among the Gond (18.33 kg/m²) followed by Korku (18.30 kg/m²) and Mahadeokoli (18.17 kg/m²). There were significant variations in the mean BMI among the tribal populations, ranging between 16.82 kg/m² and 18.33 kg/m². The prevalence of Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) was highest among the Warli, among whom 30.0% were found to be suffering from severe CED, 32.0% moderate CED and 26.0% mild CED. A greater prevalence (36.0%) of normal status of nutrition was found among the Korku. The linear regression coefficient (b f standard error) of BMI on Cormic Index or CI (SH/H) for these tribal groups was 13.68 ± 3.3 (t=4.14, p<0.000), and the correlation coefficient (r ± standard error) was 0.16 ± 0.02. The differences in BMI across the tribes were significant even after allowing for the Cormic Index. It can be said that the majority of the tribal populations of Maharashtra were lean. The high proportion of individuals with CED corroborates their low social and economic status.

Full Article >>

March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)

2010, Vol 16(2)

2010, Vol 16(3)

2011, Vol 17(1)

2011, Vol 17(2)

2011, Vol 17(3)