2005, Volume 11 No. 2

ARTICLE 10

The Effect of Calcium, Ascorbic Acid and Tannic Acid on Iron Availability from Arthrospira Platensis by Caco-2 Cell Model

Loh Su Peng1, Hishamuddin Omar2, Abdul Salam Abdullah1, Rehir Dahalan3 and Maznah Ismail1
1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
2 Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
3 Atomic Energy Licensing Board, Batu 24, Jalan Dengkil, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor, Malaysia

ABSTRACT
There are several dietary factors that are known to affect the bioavailability of iron such as protein, calcium, ascorbic acid, polyphenol and phytate. The aim of this study was to determine iron bioavailability from spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) in the presence of calcium, ascorbic acid (AA) and tannic acid (TA). The experiments were conducted using in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell culture system. Comparison was made with ferrous sulphate (FeSO4) as a reference. At low calcium concentrations (1:05, 1:10, 1:15, 1:20 Fe:Ca molar ratios), iron bioavailability from spirulina was significantly better than from FeSO4. However, at higher calcium concentrations (1:37, 1:75, 1:149 Fe:Ca molar ratios), iron bioavailability from spirulina was found to be similar to that from FeSO4. Addition of ascorbic acid of different concentrations (1:0.5, 1:1, 1:1.5 and 1:2 Fe:AA molar ratios) increased iron availability from FeSO4 more than from spirulina. The concentrations of tannic acid (1:1, 1:1.4 and 1:2 Fe:TA molar ratios) used in this study reduced iron availability from spirulina but not from FeSO4. Iron from spirulina by itself is highly bioavailable but consumers should be aware of factors that could inhibit its bioavailability.

Full Article >>

March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)

2010, Vol 16(2)

2010, Vol 16(3)

2011, Vol 17(1)

2011, Vol 17(2)

2011, Vol 17(3)