|
March 2004, Volume 10 No. 1
ARTICLE 4
Socioeconomic
Condition and Anaemia among the Mahishya Population of Southern West
Bengal, India
Premananda Bharati1, Rohini Ghosh2 & Ranjan
Gupta2
1 Anthropology and Human
Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B.T.Road,
Kolkata-700108, India
2 Centre National De La Recherche (CNRS), UPR 2147, 44 rue de’
l’Amiral Mouchez, 75014 Paris, France
ABSTRACT
A cross-sectional study was conducted among the Mahishya
population of Chakpota village in Southern West Bengal to determine
the relationship between socio-economic conditions and certain
haematological parameters, haemoglobin level and haemotocrit.
Households were divided into high, middle and low socioeconomic
groups on the basis of per capita income per year. The demographic
data were collected from all the 255 households comprising 404 adult
males and 383 adult females (above 20 years of age). Higher values
in the parameters were observed among the males in all the three
socioeconomic sub-groups. Significant differences in haemoglobin
level and haemotocrit of males were observed between the three
socioeconomic groups (p= <.01). On the contrary, insignificant
differences in haemoglobin level and haemocrit were observed between
the three socioeconomic groups among the females. Higher nutritional
intake and lower parasitic infections may be responsible for the
higher levels of the haematological parameters in the higher
socioeconomic groups. Our study reveals that sex discrimination in
food sharing seems to be the major cause for the gender difference
in haemoglobin status in all the three economic groups. It is
apparent from the study that cultural factors play an important role
in determining the haemoglobin status at micro-level, even in
high-income households.
Full
Article >>
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
2011, Vol 17(3)
|
|
|
|