|
ARTICLE IX
March 1995, Volume 1 No. 1
Mal J Nutr 1:83-94, 1995.
http://nutriweb.org.my/publications/mjn001/mjn1n1_009.pdf
The nutritional value of some processed meat products in Malaysia
Abdul Salam Babji and Seri Chempaka Mohd.
Yusof
Department of food Science & Nutrition, Faculty of Life Science,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor.
ABSTRACT
(Full Article)>
Per
capita consumption of meat and meat products in Malaysia more than doubled
from 15.70 kg in 1970 to 35.71 kg in 1990. This increase in meat consumption
is mainly due to the rapid development and wide acceptance of value
added meat and poultry products amongst Malaysian consumers. Meat products
such as burgers, sausages, hotdogs and nuggets are widely accepted and
consumed by all ethnic groups at home as well as in the fast food restaurants.
The significant expansion of the fast food industry and the increase
consumption of processed meat products makes it necessary for a re-evaluation
of the nutritional quality of popular meat products currently available
in the market. This review paper described the quality of some processed
meat products, their proximate composition, meat quality, use of non
meat proteins and binders, and the use of additives in the formulation
of burgers, frankfurters, nuggets, bologna, chicken and beef balls.
Preliminary results on the protein efficiency ratio of local meat products
seemed favourable but this study is limited to only one laboratory.
In vivo and in vitro protein digestibility studies indicated high values
on the digestibility of locally manufactured meat products. Proximate
analysis of the raw materials used in the formulation of such products
showed many with high fat and low protein contents being utilized. The
meat content was lower than the minimum amount stated by the food regulation.
This paper concludes that due to lack of information and studies on
the nutritional composition of processed meat products, concerned bodies
should take positive steps to generate reliable data to elucidate the
actual nutritional composition of such products. It is also observed
that many by-products from the animal industry from non-conventional
sources are increasingly being utilized in the manufacture of processed
meat product.
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|