|
ARTICLE VII
March 1995, Volume 1 No. 1
Mal J Nutr 1:51-61, 1995.
http://nutriweb.org.my/publications/mjn001/mjn1n1_006.pdf
Carotenoid
composition and content of legumes, tubers and roots by HPLC
Tee E-Siong1, Goh Ah-Heng2
and Khor Swan-Choo1
1 Division of Human Nutrition, Institute for Medical Research,
50588 Kuala Lumpur.
2 Formerly an undergratuate of the Tunku Abdul Rahman College,
Kuala Lumpur.
ABSTRACT
(Full Article)
As part of a series of studies
on the analytical and nutritional aspects of carotenoids and retinoids
in foods, seventeen types of legumes and their products and 9 tubers
and starchy roots were studied for their carotenoid composition and
content by HPLC. All samples were saponified and subsequently chromatographed
using a reverse-phase HPLC method previously developed in this laboratory
in which carotenoids were separated isocratically on an octadecylsilane
(C18)
column using a ternary mixture of acetonitrile, methanol and ethyl acetate
(88:10:2) as the mobile phase. Carotenoid peaks obtained were tentatively
identified using 6 reference standards similarly chromatographed. The
HPLC method used enabled the separation and quantitation of the major
carotenoids present, namely, lutein, cryptoxanthin, lycopene, g-, a-
and b-carotenes. For most of the legumes, the major carotenoids detected
were b-carotene, lutein and cryptoxanthin. Lutein was found in all the
legumes studied, and was clearly the major carotenoid in most of the
legumes, followed by unidentified carotenoids, b-carotene and cryptoxanthi.
The other carotenoids were encountered infrequently and at low levels.
The starchy roots and tubers gave a different carotenoid composition
from those obtained for the legumes: lycopene and b-carotene were detected
in all the samples except in sago. There was no clear pattern of carotenoids
present in the samples studied. Compared with the vegetables and fruits,
the carotenoid concentration in legumes, tubers and roots were found
to be much lower. None of the items studied can be said to be good sources
of vitamin A. Nevertheless, they are still of nutritional import flee,
if consumed in significant amounts.
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)
2010, Vol 16(2)
2010, Vol 16(3)
2011, Vol 17(1)
2011, Vol 17(2)
|
|
|
|